🔗 Share this article

Jelly Bean’s daughter Bertie is an charming little “ham sandwich”. The whale Orion – nicknamed “Onion” – is a sizeable but fiercely protective friend. Another whale, Zephyr has “constant motion” and moves like a worm. Lillooet is the “most affectionate” with a kind nature.

A group of thirty enclosed marine mammals in a Canada-based amusement park have been entangled in a tussle between a defunct facility, local and national governments and advocacy groups.

But those most familiar with the whales say the impassioned debate over their future often fails to consider the individual traits of the whales who, after living their entire lives in captivity, have been closely studied by the people who see them each day.

After the national authorities disallowed the sale of the belugas to China, the embattled facility near the famous falls where they are held stated it would consider to euthanize them unless the government covers the expense of keeping them alive. The nation’s fisheries minister has rejected that demand, placing the 30 whales in an increasingly precarious position.

Highly Cognitive Sea Creatures

Researchers say that beluga whales’ neuroanatomy, along with their mimicry abilities, problem solving and group interactions point to they are highly cognitive animals – something one caretaker learned first-hand.

Burgess spent several years as a marine mammal specialist, a role that entailed gaining confidence of the aquatic animals.

“Building up those connections over time takes a lot of dedication and a lot of care. At the outset, they’re very cautious of you,” she said. “Over time, you gain shared confidence. And they start being more trusting with you. It’s just so extraordinary and gratifying.”

The trainer knew the whales were highly intelligent, but she says she was nonetheless amazed by the nuances and idiosyncrasies in their dispositions. She developed a deep bond for Eve and Cleopatra with different natures.

“One whale chose me. Cleo required effort,” she said. “Both changed the way I perceive bonding.”

Public Concerns and Deteriorating Conditions

Burgess’s interaction with the whales developed against a backdrop of growing public opposition to their captivity.

During her tenure at the park, seven belugas and the park’s one killer whale, the orca, passed away. In all, nineteen belugas have perished at the park since recent years, a number which the park ascribes to age-related causes, but which activists say indicates the poor conditions in which they were maintained.

The park did not admit visitors to the public over the summer, but the former trainer says she observed directly effects of the cessation. “Structural materials is falling apart from the enclosures because they’re in disrepair and not being fixed. The whales are exploratory and so they take pieces and navigate with pieces in their mouth. It’s upsetting to see.”

The park did not respond to a request for comment, but previously claimed: “The whales … get far higher quality medical attention and around the clock attention than any human in the United Kingdom, or other places.”

Uncertain Future and Potential Resolutions

The former employee was terminated from the facility in early March following the demise of Eos, an sick beluga the caretakers had to put down. She said the park believed details of the incident were leaked to the media and she was let go shortly thereafter.

The ambiguity over the whales’ future has left Burgess and other caretakers in despair. She says the facility’s ultimatum to euthanize its whales is a bargaining chip and is a “extremely difficult” undertaking, adding any plans to put down even a individual beluga would require “considerable staff”, vehicles and machinery.

“There’s no way in hell the employees would ever do it,” she said.

Burgess backs calls for the whales to be transferred immediately from the facility, with its crumbling tanks and dwindling staff.

In the autumn, the nation’s government official rejected a bid to send the whales to China.

“Granting the request would have meant a ongoing life in captivity and a return to public entertainment,” the official stated. “As society, we know that belugas should be in the sea, not in enclosures for our amusement. I could not in clear conscience approve an relocation that would perpetuate the conditions these belugas have suffered.”

But the former trainer said the official’s comments reflect a more general incorrect perception of the circumstances of existence for belugas born in captivity.

“The people needs to understand these are whales that have lived entirely in enclosed habitats and they will need human care for the rest of their years,” she said. “Many just don’t understand that it’s not as straightforward as saying ‘end operations’.”

Sanctuary Proposal and Continuing Discussion

As decision makers attempt to find a answer, ideas have emerged, some of which have little basis in reality. An idea called for the belugas to be let go into the natural habitat of northern regions – where whales are a key source of sustenance for local populations.

A suggested sanctuary in the region of eastern Canada, which has received official endorsement, has proven contentious. The planned facility, which includes a large area of protected cove, doesn’t yet exist. Supporters remain optimistic that it could eventually represent a sustainable solution for some of the whales.

But, the former trainer says, among caretakers she’s consulted, there is “skepticism there” about what she said is “merely an untested concept” in the whales’ fate.

Some experts say the possibility of a protected habitat reflects a worldwide trend away from zoos and aquariums and could represent a workable plan in the coming months.

The project lead, director of the sanctuary project, said the site will mimic the cognitive activities and feeding regimen the whales receive from caretakers, albeit in a more expansive space. He said after the well-being of whales is fully assessed, which could take months|an extended period|